The recent Colorado Supreme Court decision to disqualify Donald Trump from the presidential primary ballot, though dramatic, appears to be a symbolic gesture with little practical impact. The 4-3 ruling is expected to be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, given its apparent political motivation rather than a constitutional basis. The Colorado justices, aware of this likelihood, have stayed their decision until the Jan. 4 ballot certification deadline, effectively passing the matter to the higher court. This strategic move allows Democrats in the blue state to maintain a political smoke screen and save face.
The Colorado Supreme Court’s history of partisan decisions, largely favoring Democrats, demonstrates a pattern of judicial activism. The court’s previous rulings on issues like taxes and gun rights align with Democratic objectives, raising concerns about its impartiality. Decisions like this one on Trump set a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging other states to use legal maneuvers for political gain. Allowing a state court to determine presidential eligibility without a criminal conviction undermines constitutional authority. The Colorado case, though currently centered on Trump, may lead to similar attempts in other states, signaling a trend where political considerations overshadow legal principles and good governance. Now who’s the real threat to democracy?
