“Hong Kong election marred by arrests, limited democracy, and low turnout.”
Three Hong Kong pro-democracy activists were apprehended before a “patriots only” district election, highlighting the marginalized state of opposition figures amidst a national security crackdown. The government aimed to elevate turnout as observers noted potential widespread abstention, contrasting with the 2019 elections during mass pro-democracy protests, which saw a record 71% turnout and victory for the democratic camp.
Members of the “League of Social Democrats” were arrested in the Central business district, planning to protest the election termed a “birdcage” lacking democratic essence due to stringent vetting that barred democrats from candidacy. Concerned about the absence of voting rights, they were followed from home.
The arrests were based on suspicions of inciting disruption in the district council election, coinciding with regulations reducing elected council seats by nearly 80% from four years ago. Candidates must now pass national security checks and gain nominations from pro-government committees, constraining pro-democracy groups and limiting electoral freedoms.
The crackdown under the China-imposed national security law led to arrests and disbandment of opposition parties. Hong Kong’s leader, John Lee, praised the election as aligning with “patriots governing Hong Kong,” emphasizing stability post-2019 protests.
Security was stringent around polling stations, with a significant police presence. While some view the security law as suppressing dissent, China cites it as restoring stability. Despite pro-government efforts, skepticism loomed, with a citizen noting the absence of diverse voices.
Turnout was notably low at 15.47% by midday, echoing sentiments of diminishing democracy. A political scientist highlighted the trend as an establishment of a “patriots-only governance structure,” signifying further erosion of democratic principles in Hong Kong.
